|
#21
|
|||
|
|||
|
This is thread drift, but I really don't see where any other part of the State has demontrated the ability to make a really, really good A-tier happen.
And what happens to the events that are annual in those areas? They give up dates, would they get them back? If other areas were interested in holding a high calibar a-tier, go for it. Demonstrate that we can keep the high level of "professionalism" when this event moves to another club. Just haven't seen it, and DFW has someone from Kansas who runs events in their area. If they are interested, why can't they even run their everyday local events? Actions speak volumes, and you new guys...............have respect for what's come before you. We need to work on some local things before we start talking about sending our event out of town............it probably would NEVER come back. It seems like everyone just wants to be a player these days, and doesn't have any understanding of what it takes to make events at this level happen. |
|
#22
|
|||
|
|||
|
A name is just a name, as we all know that World Am Doubles aren't the best am playing teams in the country, just those who played this event.
So, let other areas "prove" they can handle a big A-tier, Dallas just finally started to get VPO back on track after a few very "questionable" years. Talk is just so..........cheap. Has any other club EVER really stepped up and made a formal request/proposal to host States? I hear lots of "players" talking about it, but they generally don't run events. And then how do you decide where to let it go, and what happens when those clubs drop the ball. Wow, great courses without good added payout, that would be Grand! |
|
#23
|
||||
|
||||
|
I'm still listening to all the debate regarding a traveling TxSDGC. I still haven't made up my mind as to what would be best for TxSDGC and HFDS. But having said that I don't understand comments like this:
Quote:
Are the people opposed to a traveling TxSDGC afraid that DFW/Austin/SanAntonio would do a significantly better job than Houston and then none of the players would want to play in Houston again? Or are the people opposed to a traveling TxSDGC afraid that DFW/Austin/SanAntonio would do a significantly worse job than Houston and irrevocably damage the TxSDGC name such that none of the players would want to play the event again no matter where it was held? |
|
#24
|
|||
|
|||
|
The point I am trying to make is that if DFW was interested in running an additional big A-tier event, then why did no one pick up Z-Boaz Open after Maceman quit running events.
And ask some of the pro players who's checks bounced after VPO for several years. My main point is that these folks are not stepping up, only players talking up the issue. I DO NOT SEE ANY AREA OF THE STATE THAT IS STEPPING UP TO CONDUCT AN EVENT OF OUR QUALITY. My problems are not with the courses, but with those who would be running these events. Would they be able to run states, raise the $$$, and keep the event as one of the better payouts per player? I just don't see any club who could do that in our great state of Texas. |
|
#25
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
The "gatekeepers" of TSDGC are MOST interested in holding a high quality tournament of unequalled parallel anywhere else in the state. While some might think the most important aspect to the Texas States might be the quality of courses, I think that there are many other aspects just as important, if not, more: the ambience of playing in an event where you are pretty much certain to run into everyone else playing in it...or staffing it. I think it's always been known that we don't have the calibre of courses that we'd all like to see, we make up for it in every other aspect of running a tournament. Still, I see the value in what you are proposing...and how it could work to get folks interested in travelling around to wherever the event gets held - regardless of cities. I'd be interested in exploring a differently named option with you. I'd even be okay if we decided not to host a TSDGC for a year or two in favor of something else. But all of this is relatively minor when it comes to the functioning of the club HFDS. TSDGC is only one very small part of what the club does, and that has only been recently acquired semi-officially. The successful functioning of the club more revolves around running the leagues and interfacing with the city government's HPARD a lot! Figuring out payout, and the "system" for having and selecting our league vendor(s). It's about interfacing with some of the other clubs and their reps (which it sounds like you'd like to do) and in general it involves coming up with new ways to continue our stated mission of promoting the sport of disc golf (well...actually it says disc sports) in our city. We only really only talk about Texas States in the final couple of months before the tournament. I think you have the wrong impression that the club spends the majority of it's time talking about Texas States. We don't - and it is usually rarely ever mentioned the rest of the year. Quote:
__________________
"You can jump into a ring with a dozen clowns and begin reciting Shakespeare, but to the audience, you're just the 13th clown." - Anon |
|
#26
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#27
|
||||
|
||||
|
I disagree. I think that this tournament is the Texas Singles Championship and if you win your division, you are the Texas State Champion for that division with bragging rights until the next year and defend it.
|
|
#28
|
||||
|
||||
|
And another thing! I was talking to Scott today about if another city wanted to run TxSDGC, it would be a good idea for them to submit a proposal, say a club bank account statement with at least $5000 dedicated to added cash and also submit names of people that were committed to staffing which positions. Maybe that is asking too much. Neal knows what has to go into a proposal since he did the Pro Worlds proposal. There is a rumor that TxSDG might go to Jack Brooks Park next year. Cedar Hills is a championship course. Gulf Meadows is not (could it be redesigned)?. The third course we know nothing about. Sorry that this has nothing to do about club elections. Just can't help myself.
|
|
#29
|
|||
|
|||
|
The "gatekeepers" of TSDGC are MOST interested in holding a high quality tournament of unequalled parallel anywhere else in the state. While some might think the most important aspect to the Texas States might be the quality of courses, I think that there are many other aspects just as important, if not, more: the ambience of playing in an event where you are pretty much certain to run into everyone else playing in it...or staffing it. I think it's always been known that we don't have the calibre of courses that we'd all like to see, we make up for it in every other aspect of running a tournament
Larry makes good point here, and Scott, no offense but your comments imply that Houston lack of new MAJOR courses is somehow our fault. Yes, we have some new courses, but very few venues anywhere in the state have three courses together. As you play more events you will come to appreciate how vital all the "other stuff" is to a good event. I think some of you new guys just played your first States at QV, and just don't get it. |
|
#30
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
I would like to throw my name in for Sargeant at Arts or something along those lines. I feel there are opportunities by working with the arts in our community.
__________________
"The law of the mind is no respecter of persons. the law indicates that what you think, you create; what you feel, you attract; and what you imagine, you become" Dr. Joseph Murphy |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|